Georgie Porgie, Puddin' and Pie, Didn't like links and made them cry,
When the links came out to play, Georgie Porgie ran away
Last Thursday the British national newspaper The Guardian published an item entitled Are comment links just a form of spam?.

The journalist, Michael Pollitt, had received a comment on his personal blog that betrayed nothing out of the ordinary other than that the contributor had used the keyword "selling a business" for a name.
Intrigued, he investigated further. The link itself pointed to a firm of solicitors based in Stoke-on-Trent, England; and, what's more, they had been leaving comments on a number of different blogs using the same keyword phrase "selling a business".
The actual commentators of the piece though weren't the solicitors themselves, but a London-based digital marketing company called Pancentric.
Michael deducted that they had been using Stephan Miller's The Ultimate DoFollow Blog List to find "dofollow" blogs on which to leave comments for their client.
Pancentric are not a fly-by-night operation, but a major concern with Burger King, Whitbread, and Cadbury's as customers.
Pancentric employee, Lauren Hopwood, offered this as a defence for their SEO methods:
"The techniques we use include article and PR distribution, directory submission, link exchange, blog posting and blog commenting – these are standard and widely used practices. Our aim in all offsite activity is to ensure relevant and quality link building."
"In this instance, it does seem that some comments have been made on a number of non-relevant sites and further to your enquiry we are taking steps to remove," says Hopwood. "There is a clear distinction between blog spamming and blog commenting … blog commenting is a standard and widely practiced [sic] link-building technique."
Ouch - the journalist is so bitchy he's even gone out of his way to point out her spelling mistakes.
Also quoted in the article is leading search marketing expert, Jason Duke; Google's Anthony House and lawyer Simon Briskman.
Pancentric claim that many of their comments were placed on non-relevant sites accidentally, but that explanation rings hollow as there were too many for just the occasional error.
It seems odd that Pancentric should use this form of link building for their customers. Yes, you can work your way down Stephan's list leaving comments with "selling a business" for a name, but I can guarantee that 90% of them won't be published.
This isn't a "hit and miss" strategy - it's a waste of precious time.
I already wrote a post entitled This is pathetic: DON'T buy blog comments, which warns against losing control of your commentating to third party link builders.
It's not advisable to let somebody else give an opinion on your behalf.
The article itself falls down somewhat by conflating blog commenting as a free Adsense replacement and link building, but at least it highlights its use by big agencies rather than just the little SEO guy.
Anchor text is not allowed. To do that you need to register then you can put two links in your signature. No links to adult sites. After your comment has been added don't forget to social bookmark the post
Your IP address is: 212.113.35.162
What can you do?
The list was meant to be a tool. But you are right. It does show that if you pick a big name for your online marketing, you are not really guaranteed anything.
Link Biulding
I think if whoever leaves a comment on a blog keeps it relevant and on topic it should not matter it should not get classed as spam. Aprt from dierctory submissions - what other technique is there that is not trying to dicieve someone by leaving quality content?
Tenders
accommodation lomond park
Monster list for backlinks
Excellent post with brief explanation of do-follow blogs strategy. And the monster list of do-follow blogs (linked in this post) is simply awesome.
Business Blog
Personal